Funny Sledgehammer Hitting Someone in the Head

Getting striking in the face up with a hammer has a few unexpected benefits. It'due south a corking story. You could utilise worker's comp to alive on pizza and Netflix binges while your injury heals. It'southward too highly symbolic if y'all despise all forms of Marxism. The people's tool injuring one of their own is just likewise adept of an economical illustration to decline.

Getting hit in the face with a hammer also has a number of expected negatives. Yous might forget some things. It hurts. It may disfigure you. Y'all may regret getting striking in the face up with a hammer and ardently wish you could change that one event in your life.

The 2016 election could exist seen equally a option between ii hammers. I is a sledgehammer that will shell your visage into a pug-ish disaster. The other is a ball peen hammer that won't and so much flatten your dear facial features as slowly deform them. Sure, the sledgehammer presidency provides nifty entertainment and peradventure even a sadistic pleasance as someone finally calls the stuck-upward Washington lawyers a hateful name. The well-nigh surprising pro of a sledgehammer presidency, however, is that it finally shows u.s.a. a clear vision of what the American electorate likes.

On second thought, maybe that's a con.

If you lot haven't guessed, Donald Trump is the sledgehammer. His personality, his chosen profession, and his message are things of creature force. He'south like a political berserker, wildly swinging the axe, which many (his nomination suggests most) conservatives have been grinding for the past 8 years. However, permit's step beyond Mr. Trump's wild rhetoric. While Donald is ducking his latest political foul, or fowl, we can go a surprising amount of sanity out of the silence. We might brainstorm to inquire the question, how did nosotros get here?

There are pros and cons to getting hit in the face with a hammer.

You might start answering that question with the way we entertain ourselves. Take Deadpool for instance. It's very vehement and very vulgar. Almost all of our comedy movies are. Nosotros love a good UFC fight, watching two men crush each other until one has been knocked unconscious, bleeding from his brow on the ground. Our Facebook posts and tweets are full of sarcastic derision, calling those we disagree with names we wouldn't dare say around our mothers. Our celebrity roasts are an evidence of our cruelty. We enjoy watching a room full of people insult and devalue some other human being being while we make school campaigns against bullying.

Therein lies the problem. We take an appetite for domination, for putting people in their place, and for forcing our own agendas. And so, his Sledgehammerness rises to ability, and it shouldn't surprise us that Donald Trump has become the Republican Nominee. He's the culmination of our power-driven, wealth-driven, and ego-driven civilisation.

Notwithstanding the conservative motility has a hypocritical human relationship with authoritarian leaders. President Obama is chosen a tyrant because of how he's used executive orders. Still Trump has cast an equally authoritarian vision, promising to deport thousands of immigrants, strength United mexican states to pay for a border wall through coercive use of the patriot act and tariffs, and mostly make Congress "do things." All these promises are followed by an assuring, "believe me, they will do it," and a few sideways hand gestures. I can't see any significant difference in the two ways of acting, except that Obama is patently liberal and Trump plainly conservative.

It'southward like shooting fish in a barrel to bash Trump, just he isn't wrong on everything. I find the litigation against Christian companies for refusing to provide abortions in their healthcare plans disturbing. I as well discover it unsettling that Christian-owned businesses could exist forced to pay exorbitant sums of coin for refusing to participate in LGBT weddings, which get confronting their deeply held religious behavior.

Trump does have a fair point on the fact that we have made disastrous deals with belligerent nations like Islamic republic of iran. The conservative movement saw the Iranian Nuke Deal every bit a bad idea and a bargain which I think we'll before long regret making.

And so at that place is the question of the Supreme Court. Doubtless if Hilary Clinton is elected, she volition elect more than left-leaning judges who volition upshot decisions contrary to the conservative ethic. Donald Trump could go along the court counterbalanced.

These few areas of agreement, nonetheless, don't negate the constant stream of ignorance and vitriol that accept come from Trump'southward mouth. At that place'southward a very good reason that Republican leadership has received Trump like he had a contractible affliction.

Information technology's a conundrum that the American right now has to deal with. Do we elect the most undisciplined, distasteful man to ever seize the Republican nomination and gamble giving a fickle, immature adult the command of our nation's armed forces? The only alternative seems to be a woman who advocates a number of positions that are in direct opposition to bourgeois principles (a number of which are social bug).

The bourgeois motility's insistence on taking harder and harder stances has in a large way created this dilemma. How could we get anywhere else when any cooperation with the Autonomous Party is seen as heresy? The simple fact is that we conservatives have stopped listening a long fourth dimension ago. In our acrimony with the corruption we run across in government, nosotros've airtight our eyes and ears to the perspectives of our fellow Americans. We've close downwardly the regime, filibustered, and shouted most bipartisan efforts to death. In an attempt to discover integrity, we've instead institute an insane loyalty to an ideology that can't and won't set the multifaceted issues that our nation faces. We aren't the only ones to blame, but we conservatives need to accept a deep breath, lower our fists, and kickoff listening. Maybe a sledgehammer to our collective political faces will force us to peek out of our foxholes and commencement a 18-carat, open conversation near how to heal our pain nation.

grandolph@unews.com

weinsteinoperived1996.blogspot.com

Source: https://info.umkc.edu/unews/the-pros-and-cons-of-getting-hit-in-the-face-with-a-hammer/

Share this post